The MPM (Shafer et al., 2013; Steele and Brown, 1995), coupled with literary works on sex socialization (Tolman et al., 2003) and intimate identification (e.g. Gobrogge et al., 2007), predicts that sex identity and orientation that is sexual end in variations in use of dating apps, since well as users’ underlying motivations. We consider each below.
Men are generally speaking socialized toward valuing, being involved with numerous intimate relationships, and playing a role that is active intimate encounters, while women can be anticipated to value a far more passive sexual role and also to spend money on committed relationships (Tolman et al., 2003). In accordance with these identification distinctions, some previous studies revealed that males utilize dating sites more frequently than ladies (Valkenburg and Peter, 2007) and tend to be also more vigorous in approaching females online (Kreager et al., 2014). Other research reported limited or no sex distinctions (Smith and Duggan, 2013). Nonetheless, many research in this region would not especially concentrate on young adults or dating apps. As a result, it stays confusing whether gender differences seen for internet dating may be general to mobile dating.
Gender distinctions might become more pronounced in motivations for making use of an app that is dating than whether a dating app is employed, as a result motivations may become more strongly driven by one’s identity.